Silver’s Rally To Close In On $19 In A Year

Anna Golubova Monday July 22, 2019 11:34

With silver trading near fresh one-year highs, analysts see a lot more gains in store for the metal, which could be “more aligned to the perception of real economic activity.”

Silver saw positive action on Monday after hitting 13-month highs on Friday. September Comex silver prices were last at $16.40, up 1.30% on the day.

“We liked silver for a long time. It is nice to see it do what it should be doing,” TD Securities head of global strategy told Kitco News on Monday.

Silver picking up its pace is a reflection of the market’s perception of gold entering into a bull market, Melek pointed out.

“[The metal] has traditionally doubled the volatility of gold and it tends to outperform in time of the boom market. And I think we are very much entering that. Typically for every 1% move in gold, silver tends to move too,” Melek stated.

The longer-term outlook for silver is very positive with TD Securities projecting the metal to climb to $18.75 by the end of 2020. “We are looking at $16.10 for Q3 and $16.70 for Q4, ultimately going to $18.75 by the end of 2020,” he said.

The supply-demand fundamentals are also looking pro-higher silver prices, added Melek.

“This market could very well start to turn into a deficit and a lot of the inventories that people have been talking about should start dissipating. And much of it will be investment-driven,” he noted.

What Is Gold/Silver Ratio Telling Investors?

The gold/silver ratio surged to record highs this year, making silver very cheap relative to gold. And with silver now rallying, markets are starting to see a reversal of that trend. The gold/silver ratio was last around 87.35.

The ratio saw its biggest weekly decline in three years, falling 5.4%, said Pepperstone’s head of research Chris Weston as he questioned what the move means from the macroeconomic perspective.

“There is … an interesting macro thematic around this ratio too, with some seeing silver more aligned to the perception of real economic activity. If this is the start of a new trend of silver outperforming gold, then the debate will center on whether things are not as bad in the US and global economy,” Weston said.

“That said, it is easy to think this is just a reflection that market has pared back expectations of how aggressive the Federal Reserve will be in next week’s FOMC meeting, after last week’s communication nightmare, with the probability of a 50bp cut now set at 18%.”

A trade Weston throws out there is short gold and long silver: “If there is more downside in this ratio, meaning gold underperforms silver on a relative basis, then being short of gold and long of silver and netting off the exposures as a ‘pairs trade’ could be an interesting way of trading this theme,” he wrote on Monday.

Silver does offer an interesting opportunity to investors at the moment — being so cheap relative to gold, added TD’s Melek.

“There’s an element where it is so-called ‘poor man’s gold’ here. It is very cheap relative to gold. And if you are of the view that the Federal Reserve will cut rates aggressively along with central banks around the world then we are moving into a broadly negative view of the world. We already have 13.3 trillion of bonds yielding negative returns here, silver is a natural,” he said. “There is a lot of relative value.”

___________________

Currency intervention: Here’s how the U.S. could move to weaken the dollar

Submitted by cpowell (GATA) on Thursday, July 18, 2019. Section: Daily Dispatches

By William Watts
MarketWatch.com, New York
Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Currency traders are contemplating the “I” word.

While still seen as a longshot — Goldman Sachs described it last week as a “low but rising risk” — a growing number of analysts are warning that President Donald Trump’s longstanding frustration with the U.S. dollar’s relative strength versus major rivals could eventually lead to U.S. government to intervene in the currency market in an effort to weaken the greenback.

Last week, Bloomberg News reported that Trump has asked aides to look for ways to weaken the dollar and asked about the currency in job interviews with the candidates he’s selected for seats on the Federal Reserve’s board.

Here’s a guide to how intervention works and what it would mean for the market.

… What is intervention?

Intervention occurs when a central bank buys or sells its own currency in an effort to influence the exchange rate.

A government might take action to halt a precipitous slide or a sharp runup in its currency following a shock. It could also act in concert with or on behalf of other countries in an effort to stabilize a particular currency. In fact, the last time the U.S. intervened in the currency market was in March 2011, as part of a coordinated effort by the Group of Seven nations to arrest a surge in the Japanese yen following a devastating earthquake and tsunami.

Utilizing their massive reserves, central banks can get their way, at least in the short term. A credible threat — explicit or implied — to intervene around a certain level can often hold sway, particularly if underlying fundamentals and other factors stand in the central bank’s favor.

But even central banks can be overwhelmed by the market if fundamentals are out of line with goals. The Bank of England pulled out all the stops on Black Wednesday in 1992 in a futile effort to keep the British pound trading within the bands set by the European exchange rate mechanism, wasting billions of pounds of reserves.

… Why is intervention so rare?

Intervention is hardly novel. In fact, as the Goldman Sachs chart below illustrates, until around the mid-1990s, it was relatively common for the U.S. and other major developed countries to wade into markets in an effort to signal a desired exchange rate.

But unilateral intervention has long been out of favor, with the U.S. and other members of the Group of 20 in June reaffirming a previous commitment to refrain from competitive devaluations and to not target exchange rates for competitive purposes.

… How is it conducted?

According to the New York Fed, the foreign currencies used to intervene by the U.S. usually come equally from Federal Reserve holdings and the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund. Those holding consist of euros and Japanese yen.

The New York Fed’s trading desk does the buying and selling, often dealing simultaneously with several large interbank dealers in the spot market. The New York Fed, in a 2007 note, observed that it historically hasn’t engaged in the forward market or other derivative transactions.

The process is also meant to be transparent, the New York Fed says, with the U.S. Treasury secretary typically confirming the move while the Fed is conducting the operation or shortly thereafter. After all, authorities are attempting to send market participants a message, so there’s little incentive for them to cover their tracks.

… Who makes the call?

While the Fed is responsible for executing any FX intervention, dollar policy is traditionally the purview of the Treasury Department. The Treasury’s foreign-exchange decisions, however, have typically been taken in consultation with the Federal Reserve System.

There’s much speculation around whether the Fed would go along with a unilateral intervention effort. Powell, in congressional testimony last week, repeated that the Treasury Department is responsible for exchange rate policy. Goldman Sachs strategist Michael Cahill, noting the remark, said it seems likely the Fed would probably defer to the Treasury and go along even if it does not agree.

If the Fed were to stick to the sidelines, it would cast the effectiveness of any intervention effort into doubt, analysts said. The Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund has around just $22 billion in U.S. dollar — and another $51 billion in IMF Special Drawing Rights, or SDRs, that could be converted — that it could tap, The Fed can use its balance sheet, giving it vastly more firepower though the Treasury and the central bank typically would go 50/50 in any intervention efforts.

To Sum it Up Buy Gold!!!

_______________________________

Why Silver Is Amazingly Cheap Here & A Sure Sign That a Major Pm Sector Bullmarket Is Starting…

Clive Maund

July 1, 2019 – 11:10am

We have already been over the reasons why a major PM sector bullmarket is starting, and remarked on how undervalued silver is compared to gold, and how this is typical at the start of a major sector bullmarket, but it is worth “thumping the table” over this, because silver and silver investments may well be the best place of all to put your money at this time.

Many silver investors are manic-depressive and fanatical, which is a reality that we can turn to our advantage, for if we can figure when they are just starting to emerge from the depths of despair, it is the time to move into the sector in a big way. They are just starting to emerge from the depths of despair right now as it happens, which graphically is shown by the silver to gold ratio, the basis of which being that when investors in the sector are at their most risk averse, they tend to favor gold over silver, which is hardly surprising as gold conjures up images of solidity and security to a much greater extent than silver, which is also known as “poor man’s gold”.

It is thus most illuminating to observe a long-term 20-year chart of the silver to gold ratio, on which we see that the rare occasions on which it has dropped to the sort of extremely low levels it is now at, have always preceded a major sector bullmarket except early in 2016 which preceded a big rally. What is remarkable right now is that this ratio has even exceeded its earlier record lows, which makes a new sector bullmarket even more likely, and this indicator, just by itself, is a strong sign that this is what’s brewing.

Now to examine silver’s latest charts to see how it is shaping up.

On the 6-month chart we can see that although silver has reversed, breaking out of its preceding downtrend into a new uptrend, it has still only risen by a meager $1 from its late May lows – BIG DEAL!! Rather than being upset by this, WE SHOULD BE THANKFUL THAT IT HASN’T RISEN MORE because otherwise silver investments would have gone through the roof. Silver’s restrained performance so far is giving us more time to buy investments across the sector before it really gets moving. An important point to note before leaving this chart is the strong volume on a big up day last week, which was the 2nd biggest up day volume in history which is a very bullish sign.

The 3-year chart shows that silver has been an especially dull market during this period, but what is interesting is to compare this chart to the 3-year chart for gold in the article Gold’s Epochal Breakout, which looks way different and shows a massive divergence that is going to be made good by silver catching up big time at some point. Although silver’s 3-year chart still doesn’t look very inspiring, with weak price performance and an overhang of resistance between about $16 and $18.50, the volume buildup of recent weeks coupled with gold’s strong performance suggests that this resistance could be overcome a lot more quickly and easily than many would believe possible.

Finally, the long-term 10-year chart shows that despite gold breaking out from its giant 6-year long base pattern over the past week or so, silver is still scraping along not very far off its lows. However, this is not a situation that is expected to persist for much longer – if gold goes up it’s going to take silver with it, and the volume buildup in silver as it has risen off recent lows suggests that this rally has legs, and what is believed to be happening is that silver is just starting to rise off the 2nd low of a Double Bottom, whose 1st low occurred late in 2015 – early in 2016. If this interpretation is correct then we are at an excellent entry point here for all silver related investments.

End of update.


_________________________